Guide to Midge Monitoring
This
procedure has been taken from the report by Davis et al. (1990)
"Towards more Effective Control of Nuisance Chironomids (Midges)
in Metropolitan Wetlands, Perth, Western Australia" and the "Wetland
Bioassesment Manual (Macroinvertebrates)" by Davis et al. (1999).
The first
decision to be made when commencing a sampling regime is how many
samples to collect and at what frequency. As with most statistics
the more information collected, the greater the likelihood that
a true representation of the actual environment is presented. Sample
numbers are dependent on the size of the survey area, and may also
be limited by time constraints. In most situations 10 sites, evenly
dispersed around a water body, are recommended.
Sampling
should be conducted fortnightly during the summer period (November
to February) and weekly when the numbers of midge larvae begin to
rise quickly. If the monitoring is to be continued throughout the
year then samples should be collected monthly or even bi-monthly.
Sampling frequency should be varied according to the amount of midge
larvae present rather than purely by the time of year.
Field Sampling
This section has been split into two components,
firstly larval midge sampling and secondly physico-chemical sampling.
Larval Midge Sampling
Equipment required for midge collection:
Core sample
The corer is used to
measure down approximately 600mm from the top of the sediment to
the water level. Using the corer, with 100mm diameter, take a sediment
sample, remembering to cover the hole in the top of the corer when
removing it from the lake bed.
This ensures that the entire sample is retained within the corer
as it is removed from the lake.
Place the core sample into a plastic bag along with a water proof
paper tag with the wetland name, location number and date written
on it in pencil (pen tends to smudge).
Fasten the top of the bag securely with an elastic band Make sure
to record your sampling sites on a map so that the same sites can
be sampled each time.
This allows any problem areas to be identified within the wetland.
Separating the midges
from the mud sample.
Equipment required for
separating the midge larvae from the mud sample
- Two plastic buckets
- Calcium chloride
flakes (available from pool supply shops)
- A sieve with a mesh
size of 0.25mm or less
- Tweezers
- Rubber gloves
- Ethanol and containers
to store the midge larvae in if required
NOTE: Gloves should
be worn whenever handling calcium chloride as it can be very irritating
to the skin.
- Make up a saturated
solution of calcium chloride in one of the buckets. This is
done by adding 3.5kg of calcium chloride flakes to 4 litres
of water and stirring until all the flakes are completely dissolved.
If a scum forms on the surface it can be removed with a folded
rag.
- Place mud sample
into the bucket containing the calcium chloride solution and
stir well, breaking up any lumps.
- Using the tweezers,
pick of all the midge larvae that float to the surface, keeping
a record of the number removed. The sample may need to be stirred
a few times during sorting to ensure that all the midge larvae
float to the surface. If the larvae are to be identified later
they should be placed in a 70% ethanol, 30% water solution.
- When all the larvae
are removed pour the calcium chloride and mud mixture through
a sieve, into the second bucket. The contents of the sieve can
then be disposed of and the calcium chloride solution, now in
the second bucket, re-used. The solution can be re-used for
up to ten samples but small amounts of calcium chloride flakes
may need to be added to maintain a saturated solution.
- Once the number
of midge larvae in each sample have been counted it is possible
to calculate the number of larvae per core and subsequently
the number of larvae per square meter. The standard error, which
is measure of the possible variation of the average, should
also be calculated.
Calculations
Statistics
are an important tool which allow a better understanding of the
data collected. For the purpose of demonstrating the recommended
statistics, a hypothetical wetland has been devised - "Lake
Banshee".
Lake
Banshee
| Location |
Midge
Larval Numbers |
| 1 |
24 |
| 2 |
23 |
| 3 |
15 |
| 4 |
4 |
| 5 |
78 |
| 6 |
25 |
| 7 |
6 |
| 8 |
3 |
| 9 |
89 |
| 10 |
10 |
| TOTAL |
277 |
Number
of Samples (n) = 10
Total Number of Midge Larvae (T) = 277
Firstly,
calculate the average number of midge larvae per core sample (X)
| X |
= |
T/n |
| Average |
= |
Total Number of
Midge Larvae/The number of samples |
| |
= |
277/10 |
| |
= |
27.7 |
It
is also recommended that the amount of variation between sampling
locations be calculated. This is the standard error (SE).
| Standard Deviation
(SD)* |
= |
30.64 |
| SE |
= |
SD / SQRT(n -
1) |
| Standard Error |
= |
Standard Deviation
/ SQRT (number of samples subtract 1) |
| |
= |
30.64 / SQRT (10
- 1) |
| |
= |
10.21 |
*
This function can be found on most scientific calculators
The
average number of midges per core sample is 27.7 ± 10.21.
This figure indicates that the "true" average number
of midges per core sample varies between 17.49 to 37.91.
Now
the number of midges per square meter can be calculated. This
is done as follows:
Firstly,
calculate the number of times your corer fits into a square meter
(C)
| Corer diameter
|
= |
0.10m |
| Corer radius (r)
|
= |
0.05m,/TD>
|
| C |
= |
1 / pi * r2 |
| Number of times
corer fits into a square meter |
= |
1 / pi multiplied
by the radius squared |
| |
= |
1 / 3.14 * (0.05)2 |
| |
= |
1 / 0.00785 |
| |
= |
127.4 |
| Number of midges
per m2 |
= |
X * C |
| |
= |
Average number
of larva per core multiplied by the Number of times the corer
fits into a square meter. |
| |
= |
27.7 * 127.4 |
| |
= |
3518 midges per
metre2 |
| Standard error
per m2 |
= |
SE * C |
| |
= |
Standard Error
multiplied by the Number of times the corer fits into a square
meter |
| |
= |
10.21 x 127.4 |
| |
= |
1301 midges per
metre2 |
Therefore,
at Lake Banshee there were 3518 ± 1301 midges per metre2
The
threshold for possible pesticide treatment is estimated to be 2000
larval midges per square metre. Once numbers exceed this level problems
start to develop. This information is based on complaints received
from residents of suburbs adjoining wetlands where larval densities
have been regularly monitored. Many councils have found that treatment
may be left until larval midge numbers exceed 5000 midges per square
metre with little or no resident complaints.
It should
be noted that as midge larvae tend to inhabit only shallow water
a shallow wetland will actually contain more larval midges than
a deep lake with the same midges density per square metre.
Chironomid identification
In most
situations simply determining the number of midges present in a
wetland may be satisfactory. However, midge identification can lead
to a better understanding of the processes occurring within the
wetland. There are a number of keys that can be used for identification.
"A Guide to Wetland Invertebrates of Southwestern Australia"
(Davis & Christidis, 1997) published by the Western Australian Museum,
provides a key and illustrations of the species commonly found in
Perth wetlands.
Physico-Chemical
Monitoring
The
amount of physico-chemical monitoring undertaken as part of the
monitoring program will be at least partially dependent on the budget
allocated to the work. Ideally, a number of parameters should be
monitored at each site sampled for midge larvae.
- pH
- Electrical Conductivity
(EC)
- Dissolved Oxygen
(DO)
- Phosphorus (P) -
total phosphorus and filterable reactive P
- Nitrogen (N) - total
nitrogen, nitrite/nitrate and ammonium
- Chlorophyll a
All
equipment needed for physico-chemical monitoring can be obtained
from most laboratory supply stores.
pH
pH should
be measured in the field with a portable, hand held, pH meter. Samples
cannot be stored to measure later as the pH will alter rapidly by
biological activity and temperature.
Methodology
Ensure
that the pH meter is calibrated and that the protective sheath (if
it has one) is removed from the sensor. Switch on the unit and allow
it to warm up for the period of time recommended by the manufacturer
(usually about 15 minutes). Place the probe into the wetland, ensuring
it is fully immersed and wait for the reading to stabilise. Record
the reading and move on to the next site and repeat the process.
Electrical Conductivity
(EC)
Electrical
conductivity should also ideally be measured in the field though
it is possible to take a water sample to analyse later.
Methodology
Similar
to that described for pH.
Temperature
Temperature
must be recorded at the wetland.
Methodology
Most
pH meters will also measure temperature so utilise the pH meter
and record the temperature at the same time as the pH.
Dissolved Oxygen
(DO)
Again,
DO should ideally be measured in the field as it is temperature
dependent and disturbing the water may add more oxygen to it.
Methodology
Requires
the use of a DO meter.
Phosphorus (P)
There
are two main forms of P, which are routinely measured as part of
wetland monitoring - Total and orthophosphate.
Total P - Represents
the total amount of P present within a water sample in both organic
and inorganic forms.
Orthophosphate - Represents the amount of inorganic P readily
available in the water column for uptake by plants.
Methodology
Ideally,
nutrients should be measured at each site however this can become
costly and it may be advisable to use a bulked sample. To make a
bulked sample take the same quantity of water from each of the ten
sites sampled for midge larvae and pour them all together into a
clean bucket. Mix the water well and then, for total phosphorus,
place a small amount of water into a clean bottle (it is possible
to obtain suitable bottles from laboratories who test for nutrients)
labelled with the wetland name, site number (if applicable) date
and nutrient to be analysed (total P). Then place the sample into
the freezer to store until analysis. For orthophosphate filter a
small quantity of water through a 0.45mm filter and pour it into
a clean bottle. Label the bottle with the same information as for
total phosphorus and freeze the sample until analysis. These samples
can then be taken to an analytical laboratory for testing.
Nitrogen (N)
Nitrogen
occurs in a number of forms in wetlands, the following are the types
that are routinely monitored:
Total nitrogen -
Refers to the amount of nitrogen present in a sample in both the
organic and inorganic forms.
Ammonium - this is the main form of nitrogen produced by the breakdown
of organic material and urea. Ammonium is one of the forms of
N most commonly utilised by aquatic plants. This form of N is
readily oxidised to nitrite and then to nitrate.
Nitrite/Nitrate - Nitrate is one of the forms of N most commonly
utilised by aquatic plants.
Methodology
The
sampling methodology for N is the same as for P. For total N, use
unfiltered water and freeze the sample for later analysis. For ammonium
and nitrite/nitrate filtered water is utilised and the samples are
frozen. Remember to label the bottle clearly with either total N,
nitrite/nitrate or ammonium, the wetland name, sample date and site
number.
If there
are constraints on the amount of nutrients that can be analysed
then it may be necessary to analyse fewer forms of nutrients. In
this case the recommended nutrients to test are total phosphorus
and total nitrogen. Over time this will still give a good indication
as to the nutrient status of the waterbody being tested.
Chlorophyll a
The
amount of chlorophyll a in a waterbody is a good measure of phytoplankton
productivity, which in turn provides an indication of the potential
food resources available to larval midges.
Methodology
As soon
as possible after collection filter a known quantity of water through
a 47 micron glass microfibre filter. Ideally a litre should be filtered
however this can rarely be achieved, usually 500 or 250ml is filtered.
Use tweezers to carefully fold the filter paper in half and then
in half again. Take another filter paper and fold it around the
sample filter paper. Place the filter paper in an envelope with
the date, wetlands name, site number and amount of water filtered.
Place the envelope into a plastic clip-seal bag and freeze the sample
in the dark until analysis. Chlorophyll a can be measured from a
bulked sample if required.
Before
commencing nutrient monitoring it is advisable to contact the laboratory
that will be used for analysis to ensure that their standards for
sample collection will be followed.
References
Davis, J.A., Pinder, A.M., Trayler, K.M. and
Harrington, S.A. (1990). Towards More Effective Control of Nuisance
Chironomids (Midges) in Metropolitan Wetlands, Perth, Western
Australia. Unpublished Report for the Midge Research Steering
Committee, Australia.
Davis, Dr. J., Horwitz, Dr. P., Norris, Dr. R., Chessman, Dr.
B., McGuire, M., Sommer, B. and Trayler, Dr. K. (1999). Wetlands
Bioassessment Manual (Macroinvertebrates). National Wetlands Research
and Development Program, Australia.
Davis, J. and Christidis, F. (1997). A Guide to Wetland Invertebrates
of Southwestern Australia. Western Australian Museum, Australia.
|