Chemical
Control
S-methoprene
S-methoprene
is a pesticide that acts as a juvenile hormone mimic disrupting
the development of insects and preventing the larvae from emerging
as adults. Used primarily in mosquito management, S-methoprene also
has the potential to provide control against midge (Ali 1981; Lothrop
and Mulla 1998). Although s-methoprene is perceived as being less
toxic to non-target organisms than Abate, current research indicates
that previous short-term studies may need to be reconsidered in
light of more recent longer-term investigations. Hershey et al.
(1998) studied the long-term effects of s-methoprene on 179 genera
of insects in 27 wetlands in Minnesota and found that taxa richness
was significantly reduced in the second year of s-methoprene application.
Toxicity to, and interference with larval development has also been
reported for a wide range of crustaceans including Daphnia sp. (Olmstead
and LeBlanc 2001), copepods (Bircher and Ruber 1988), Palaemonetes
sp. (shrimps) (McKenney and Matthews 1990) and brine shrimp larvae
(Ahl and Brown 1990). Walker et al. (2005) found that s-methoprene
had adverse effects on lobster larvae and Horst and Walker (1999)
reported that s-methoprene delayed the moulting of blue crabs (Callinectes
sapidus) and resulted in the deaths of 80% of larvae after exposure
for 10 days. The Environmental Protection Authority (USA) summarised
available fish studies and concluded that s-methoprene is moderately
toxic to warm water freshwater fish and slightly toxic to coldwater,
freshwater fish (EPA 1991). The effects on Western Australian freshwater
or estuarine fish species are unknown.
S-methoprene
is not currently registered for use in Western Australia. However,
Terry Phillips from Pacific Biologics, the Australian distributor
of s-methoprene, has communicated that the company is looking to
conduct efficacy trials in Western Australia in summer 05/06, and
has indicated that protocols for these could be developed in conjunction
with the Midge Research Group. A search of the literature revealed
over 550 journal articles relating to the effects of s-methoprene
on aquatic and terrestrial organisms and plants. It is recommended
that a comprehensive evaluation of the recent literature be conducted
to determine the non-target impacts of s-methoprene when used at
likely field application rates for midge control. It is also recommended
that toxicity trials on local fauna to determine the potential effects
on south-western Australian aquatic ecosystems be conducted if this
chemical is to be considered for use. Terry Phillips has indicated
that the APVMA registration procedure for s-methoprene will require
toxicity testing on local aquatic fauna.
Abate
Abate (Temephos)
is an organophosphate pesticide that has been used to control larval
midges in wetlands on the Swan Coastal Plain for over thirty years.
However, disadvantages with the use of Abate include problems with
larval resistance, and deleterious effects on non-target species.
There is also some evidence to suggest that Abate increases the
growth rate of cyanobacteria (Birmingham and Colman 1976; Wurtsbaugh
and Apperson 1978). Currently, regular use of Abate to control nuisance
midge is being undertaken at only a few lakes in the Perth Metropolitan
area. These include Lake Joondalup, Yangebup Lake, North Lake and
Bibra Lake. Although an effective treatment in general, the use
of Abate does not guarantee complete control of larval midge. Lund
(2003) found that over a three-year period of Abate application
at Lake Joondalup the percentage of larvae killed was highly variable.
Lund (2003) suggested that the effectiveness of Abate at Lake Joondalup
could be improved by:
- Spraying
earlier in the year, towards the beginning of August, before nuisance
levels of Chironomus occidentalis and C. alternans occur and while
these populations are still growing.
- Increasing
the current knowledge regarding midge biology. Research by Suffell
(2002) suggested that further understanding of midge lifecycles
is required to determine times when the population is more vulnerable
to control measures. Current management techniques rely on spraying
when larval densities reach critical threshold levels. Spraying
when a nominated threshold has been exceeded appears to allow
sufficient midges to emerge to repopulate the lake.
- Development
of a population model related to water quality, larval densities
and emergence data which could be used to predict nuisance midge
problems.
Back to Control Option
Model
|